11.11.2010

American Mothers Political Party Radio Show Today @ 5 PM CST 6 PM EST Call in Number:(347) 205-9977

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/americanmotherspoliticalparty/2010/11/11/still-standing

AMPP is a social movement seeking justice and accountability within the family court system which includes DHHS/CPS, psychologists and other so called experts.

 

We as mothers demand CITIZENSHIP and our Rights to our Children.

We demand that our children not be used as pawns by our abuser in a custody dispute.

We demand that Mothers and Children be equally protected against court ordered visitation with an abuser.

We demand that Mothers and Children be given the same rights, privileges and voice that the abuser gets in family courts!

We demand that our President take action now as can no longer afford to be silent and we won’t.

We demand the same "rights and freedoms" to which all humans are entitled.

 

Behind the closed doors of the dirty little secret of the family court system, thousands of women each year lose child custody to violent men who beat and abuse Mothers and Children. Family courts are not family-friendly and betray the best interests of the child.

Until Mothers and Children's voices are heard we will never shut up, give up or go away!

(CA) Judge DeAnn Salcido - Who Turned Court into Reality Show Reigns

Judge who turned court into reality show resigns

Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/10/BA4V1GA5J1.DTL#ixzz14wcgcAIk

(11-10) 16:17 PST SAN DIEGO -- A state commission accepted the resignation Wednesday of a San Diego judge who auditioned for a reality-TV program in her courtroom, led spectators in "woo-woo" chants, and told a defendant that if he violated probation, "you will definitely be screwed and we don't offer Vaseline for that."

The Commission on Judicial Performance censured Superior Court Judge DeAnn Salcido on the condition that she leave the bench. The commission said she had committed 39 acts of misconduct.

Salcido has expressed regret for the "Vaseline" remark and a few other actions, but issued an unapologetic statement Wednesday saying there were "certain perceptions of my style that made it prudent for me to move on."

"Humor and less formality in certain courtroom contexts can be very effective," Salcido said. Her comments were intended to "connect with the offenders, the victims and others in the courtroom," she said.

Salcido, 45, a former prosecutor and business lawyer, was appointed to the bench by Gov. Gray Davis in 2002. She was elected to a new six-year term in June, when she was one of four San Diego judges unsuccessfully challenged by conservative Christian lawyers. The commission made its charges public in September.

Salcido acknowledged allowing a local television producer, who was looking into a possible "Judge Judy"-type show, to film a day of proceedings in her court in May 2009. The commission said Salcido had agreed to "line up my most interesting cases" for that day and appeared to be playing to the cameras.

Referring to one defendant's positive test for marijuana, she asked the audience, "Can I get a woo, woo, woo?"

She later led the spectators in a chant of, "Do or do not, there is no try," asked another defendant that day if he needed to "call the lifeline" about a sentencing choice, and told a defendant he would be "screwed" without Vaseline if jailed for a probation violation, the commission said.

In another case that day, the commission said, Salcido noted that a defendant was smiling, and told him, "They might like your smile in jail." She later told the commission she regretted the comment.

Salcido also disparaged other court personnel, the commission said. She referred to a fellow judge as "assistant public defender" and described court clerks several times as "cucumbers."

The commission said judicial humor "should never be used in a courtroom, as it was by Judge Salcido, to ridicule, embarrass or disparage others, or in a manner that diminishes the dignity of the judicial process."

E-mail Bob Egelko at begelko@sfchronicle.com.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/10/BA4V1GA5J1.DTL#ixzz14wcloM4L

11.09.2010

THE HUFFINGTON POST AND DR. RICHARD WARSHAK: SUPPORTING CHILD ABUSERS THROUGH CENSORSHIP

Posted by Rights For Mothers

FILED IN: ACTIVISM, BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD, CENSORSHIP, CHILD CUSTODY, CHILD CUSTODY BATTLE,CHILD CUSTODY FOR SALE, CHILDREN'S RIGHTS, CORRUPT BASTARDS, CORRUPT PSYCHOLOGISTS, DSM-V,DOMESTIC VIOLENCE BY PROXY, JUDICIAL IMMUNITY, LEGAL ABUSE, PAS, PARENTAL ALIENATION DISORDER,PARENTAL ALIENATION DISORDERS, PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME, THE HUFFINGTON POST, CHILD CUSTODY FOR ABUSERS, PARENTAL ALIENATION

Everyone knows that the concept of “parental alienation” will not be in the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), but this hasn’t thwarted those who make a handsome income off of it.  Dr. Richard Warshak, who sells his testimony and services treating “parental alienation” in child custody cases, has apparently bought or scammed his way onto The Huffington Post and is not allowing comments on how others, including professional organizations, look at this excuse for protecting abusive parents.  I, along with several other domestic violence advocates, posted comments on The Huffington Post in response to a new post by Warshak that touts his professional bread-and-butter, and they were apparently dropped in their bit bucket.  Here is my first comment:

Many professional organizations recognize that claims of so-called “parental alienation” are used by abusive spouses to gain custody of children from their victims.  Some of these organizations include the American Judges Association, the National District Attorney’s Association, the American Bar Association, and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, with the latter warning family court judges not to accept claims of “parental alienation” or “parental alienation syndrome” because of it’s well know use by abusers.  Research has shown that the number one reason children refuse to visit a parent is because of the behavior of that parent.  Stop putting children in danger by placing them with the abuser.  Dr. Warshak and others that push this so-called disorder make a lot of money selling their testimony in this family court scam.  I would think The Huffington Post was above promoting such snake oil salesmen.

As of the morning after Warshak’s post appeared on The Huffington Post, there were twelve hand-picked comments on the post, which includes one by Warshak cheerleader “Monika” who is Monika Logan, a big “parental alienation” supporter in Texas.  She is a regular commenter on stories that push this scam.  Her blog supports these people who make lots of money off of promoting this “judicial tool of abuse.”

Warshak was involved in a case recently in Canada, in which he testified that two boys apparently “poisoned” by “parental alienation” would benefit being treated at his “treatment center,” a center that charges $40,000 per four day session.  The recommendation was so ordered, but overturned in appeal because Warshak admitted that he had only interviewed the parent claiming “parental alienation” and not the other parent.  Warshak failed to even interview the boys when he recommended them for his unproven program.  Seems $40,000 is quite an incentive to recommend something to someone he hasn’t even seen.

Shame on The Huffington Post to allow these quacks and their supporters space to sell their wares, because that is exactly what they are doing.  Then again, The Huffington Post has a history of censorship.  So be careful what you read even if you think it is a respectable site.  Apparently everyone has their price, and there’s a lot to be made in the “parental alienation” jackpot.

It was suggested to post comments on censorship on The Huffington Post, then share on your Facebook or Twitter account…this is an excellent idea!

See here For Rest of Article: THE HUFFINGTON POST AND DR. RICHARD WARSHAK: SUPPORTING CHILD ABUSERS THROUGH CENSORSHIP

11.08.2010

RIKKI DOMBROWSKI: POSTER CHILD FOR ALL THAT IS WRONG WITH FAMILY COURT PROCEEDINGS

Posted by Nancy Carroll

 

FILED IN: ACTIVISM, ANGRY FATHERS, BAD DADS, BAD GUARDIAN AD LITEM, BAD JUDGES, BAD LAWYERS,BARACK OBAMA, BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD, CHILD CUSTODY FOR SALE, CLAUDINE DOMBROWSKI,CORRUPT JUDGES, CORRUPT LAWYERS, CORRUPT BASTARDS, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, DR. WILLIAM BERNET,FATHERS RIGHTS, HAL RICHARDSON, JASON P. HOFFMAN, JILL DYKES, JUDGE DAVID DEBENHAM, KANSAS,NONCUSTODIAL MOTHERS, PAS, PARENTAL ALIENATION DISORDER, PARENTAL ALIENATION DISORDERS,PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME, RIKKI DOMBROWSKI, CHILD CUSTODY FOR ABUSERS, PARENTAL ALIENATION

 

Rikki-on-Dykes-Page

Rikki Dombrowski, as shown on Guardian ad Litem M. Jill Dyke's Facebook page.

 

Rikki is often on my mind.  Granted, not as much as on her mother, Claudine Dombrowski’s, mind.  I was also a child victim of family courts, just as Rikki is.  Just as my children are now, although I don’t write about them at all (too traumatic).

Rikki was taken to talk to the judge (alone, no witnesses), Judge David Debenham, a couple of weeks ago, while her mother Claudine was in the midst of another judicial smackdown.  Although she had been given the right to see her daughter after years of no or limited (supervised) contact in the January 2010 hearing that I attended as a court watcher, daddy Hal Richardson did everything in his power to not allow the visits to take place.  He had 83 violations of the court order up to a point this fall…read about the case here.

Witnesses have told me that when daddy Hal Richardson brought Rikki to be interviewed by the judge, he was acting very sternly towards her, and she was crying just before going in. Knowing that the last time Rikki was “allowed” to call her mother this past spring to cancel her two hour Sunday visitation, daddy Hall Richardson was yelling at Rikki in the background and Rikki was uncontrollably crying while she was telling Claudine she couldn’t see her that day.  That was the last phone call to take place.

My point is Rikki is one of many children in a situation like this, threatened to follow the abuser’s script or face the consequences.  In Rikki’s case, there is a child’s coffin in Hal Richardson’s living room ready for use.  If the corrupt court officials in this case actually did their jobs, Richardson would be in prison and Rikki would be with her mother.  There is a movement now to disbar Rene Netherton.  M. Jill Dykes lunged at Claudine in the courthouse hallway, and had her husband call to threaten her…actions will be filed on this also.   Snorting Topeka attorney Jason P. Hoffman continues to lie in court about anything to help his abusive client Hal Richardson, including claiming Claudine Dombrowski is me when he knows she is not.   No, Rikki Dombrowski is a cash cow to them.

Children like this are often a big source of income to people like this.  Snorting Jason L. Hoffman used the term “parental alienation” so much during the January 2010 hearing, I lost count.  This term, and syndromes/disorders associated with it, were invented by people (like Dr. William Bernet) who make lots of money from it, using it to sell books and sell their “testimony.”  It is well known by judge’s associations as a tool for abusers to get custody of children.  It certainly worked in this case…imbecile Judge Debenham fell for it (or maybe was paid off).

When I think of Rikki getting threatened in the courthouse hallway and her crying, I get really mad.  This is what our children are going through.  When will it stop?  The White House addressed family court cases during it’s press conference somewhat due to this case (after all they have beenreading about it here), but when is something actually going to be done?

Read more here: 08.NOV.2010 RIKKI DOMBROWSKI: POSTER CHILD FOR ALL THAT IS WRONG WITH FAMILY COURT PROCEEDINGS

11.05.2010

Judge David Debenham-

Unconstitutional Judicial Gag Orders ---Prompted by embarrassed officials who dislike scrutiny and criticism by internet bloggers in the wake of burgeoning out-of-control shoot-from-the-hip "therapeutic jurisprudence" in the family courts. These orders are ILLEGAL under the First Amendment as violations of the constitutional prohibition against prior restraint.

Debenham, David B. Claudine Dombrowski a battered mother who continues to be battered by the Court this Court

DAVID B DEBENHAM

Dombrowski v Richardson

http://www.shawneecourt.org/doe/search.jsp?caseNumber=96d217&first=&middle=&last=&mob=&yob=&location=internet

08/20/2010
-
MISC. Petitioner in person and by Donald Hoffman. Respondent in person and by Robert E. Duncan, II. G.A.L., Jill Dykes, present. Court Reporter: Digital Div. 13. Matter proceeds on review of Court's order of January 28, 2010, establishing unsupervised parenting time for Respondent. Dr. Rodeheffer offers testimony - matter continued to a date to be agreed upon for additional testimony. Court finds that Dr. Rodeheffer's report of May 18, 2010, has been published on the website of Respondent. Court suspends Respondent's parenting time pending final hearing in this matter. Respondent's counsel is to review Respondent's cell phone to determine if there are images of report on Respondent's cell phone - Respondent's phone time with minor child to continue but to Petitioner's home phone. Due to publication of report on the Internet, which deals with minor child, Court finds that there is a privacy interest of the minor child that is central to these proceedings and outweighs the public interest and orders that the files, records, and transcripts of the case be sealed until further order of the Court. J. Dykes to do order. DBD

08/20/2010
-
SET - Hearing on 10/19/10 at 09:00AM. in division 13.

08/20/2010
-
Notice of hearing for 10/19/10 Hearing issued .

08/26/2010
-
PETITION FOR ALLOWANCE AND ASSESSMENT OF COURT-APPOINTED ATTORNEY/GUARDIAN AD LITEM FEES & ORDER ALLOWING AND ASSESSING FEE FILED - DBD. (Sent Certified copy to Ct Admin Office)

09/13/2010
-
Case transferred from Div. 13 to Div. 03, New Judicial Assignment. JMS

09/13/2010
-
ORDER FILED - DBD.

10/19/2010
-
MISC. Petitioner in person and by Donald Hoffman. Respondent in person and by Robert E. Duncan, II. G.A.L., Jill Dykes, present. Court Reporter: Sarah Davison. Parties continue presentation of evidence. Matter continued to 10/20/10 for Court to interview minor child. DBD

10/20/2010
-
MISC. Petitioner in person and by Donald Hoffman and Jason Hoffman. Respondent in person and by Robert E. Duncan, II. G.A.L., Jill Dykes, present. Court Reporter: Sarah Davison. Court finds inappropriate under K.S.A. 60-1616(a) to allow minor child control over when parenting time with mother should occur. Based on Respondent's violation of Court orders by posting material on the internet which references her daughter, continuing to bring up court case and proceedings with minor daughter, and volatile and unpredictable behavior with minor daughter, Court orders supervised parenting time for Respondent of every other Sunday from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Petitioner, Respondent and G.A.L. to agree on individual who will supervise parenting time or submit names to Court. Minor child has cell phone and can initiate phone calls to Respondent. Respondent not to initiate phone calls, text or e-mails to minor daughter. Respondent prohibited from placing any likeness of minor daughter, materials, or documents referring to minor daughter on internet or allow others to link to her internet site, face page, twitter site which would allow anyone to go to a linked site with this information. Respondent not to be provided any copies of medical or therapy records of minor daughter. T. Duncan to do JE. DBD

Instead of going to the store, their father took Nelson, 10, and Crystal, 8, to his house and set it on fire, killing them and himself. He did it to get back at ex-wife for leaving their abusive relationship.

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE GETS DRAMATIC AIRING AT MOVING FORUM

Written by DAPHNE TAYLOR

jenne-carter-and-kids_web.pngSpecial to South Florida Times

Jennie Carter thought she was sending her two young children to the store with their father for an hour or so.  They’d been preparing for a  trip to Georgia to see snow for the first time but their father, her ex-husband, begged to see the kids before they left. Carter was hesitant but allowed him to take them.

Instead of going to the store, their father took Nelson, 10, and Crystal, 8, to his house and set it on fire, killing them and himself.

He did it, Carter, 41, of Lake Worth, said, to get back at her for leaving their abusive relationship.

“I handed my kids to a killer,” Carter said, choking up as she recalled the 2006 tragedy before an audience at New Bethel Missionary Baptist Church in West Palm Beach on Oct. 16, as part of the observance of Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October.

The issue was already at the forefront in Palm Beach County, after the worst murder-suicide in the history of the county in September when Patrick Alexander Dell, 41, shot and killed his estranged wife Natasha Whyte-Dell and four of her children in their Riviera Beach home. The couple had a long history of domestic violence.

Carter said she wanted to put an end to such tragedies and four years after she lost her children, she continues to speak out against domestic violence. Then state Sen. Ted Deutch, D-Boca Raton, was so moved by her advocacy that he sponsored a domestic violence bill in honor of Carter.

The law requires judges to consider charges of domestic or sexual abuse, involving either parent, when granting custody or arranging visitation. Carter believes if her ex-husband had supervised visits with their children, they might still be alive.

“I am so proud to have passed this legislation… While there is no doubt that children benefit from spending time with both parents, it is always necessary to determine how best to protect the child,” Deutch said upon passage of the bill.

Carter said she became an advocate to honor her children. “It doesn’t take a lot of people to change a law. It takes one person,” she told the audience.

While passing laws is important, changing the mindset regarding domestic violence in the black community is an altogether different challenge, especially when it comes to the black church, said the Rev. Johnnie Ray “J.R.” Thicklin, senior pastor of Kingdom Harvest Ministries of West Palm Beach and president of Destiny By Choice.

Thicklin has held several positions in the past 20 years related to domestic violence and is regarded as a trailblazer in breaking the silence in the church. He organized the session, titled, “Domestic Violence and Faith in the African American Community – Barriers and Bridges Community Forum,”  bringing together Carter and other domestic violence victims, experts and citizens to raise awareness of the prevalence of domestic violence in the black community and the role that faith  plays in the lives of  victims and perpetrators.

Thicklin is writing a book, Hush:  What the Church Didn’t Tell You about Domestic Violence, due out next year.  His company helps the faith community deal with what is regarded as a sensitive subject. He said the church, which is usually a safe haven in the black community, hasn’t dealt with the issue well in the past.

Ivanah Thomas of Orlando agreed.  Today, she is a successful business owner, but when she was 19 she was married to an abusive man 21 years her senior and a minister. The church, including the pastor, “turned a blind eye” and no one would help her, she said, and her husband was allowed to continue as a minister.

Thicklin said it was not uncommon to find preachers, among other powerful men, dealing with domestic violence in their own lives. “Research will show you that there’s a lot of domestic violence in positions such as pastors, law enforcement, lawyers and athletes,” he said. “People who are in empowering positions often have a problem with power themselves.”

The Rev. Antoinne “A.J.” Wright, senior pastor of Shiloh Family Worship Center Ministries in Riviera Beach, said even helping victims in the church can be a sensitive subject. He encourages his parishioners to get away from their abuser. But he told of an instance where he suggested a woman leave her abuser. She reconciled with him and was upset with Wright, saying he was wrong to tell her to leave her relationship.

Debi Stewart, of West Palm Beach, understands why some women stay. The longtime television host in Palm Beach County said at the forum that, years ago, she stayed in an abusive marriage because she was “determined to fix it.”  She had been ashamed to admit that, as a well known reporter, she was suffering abuse at home. She recalled putting on heavy stage make-up to cover up a black eye before conducting an on-camera interview.

But she stayed two years after the first incidence of violence, because her family frowned upon divorce. She eventually left when her young daughter unwittingly shared a startling revelation: The 3-year old equated the violence of another pre-schooler toward her with the little boy “liking” her.

Witnessing abuse in the home had resulted in her daughter’s confusion regarding love – even at such a young age, she said. Stewart said at that point she left her husband, refusing to allow her daughter to grow up with such psychological scars.

“I could’ve been killed trying to stay and make it work,” she said.

Statistics support that possibility. According to destinybychoice.org, every six hours a woman is killed by domestic violence, a domestic violence act occurs every 12 seconds, resulting in more than four million victims per year.

Also, African-American women are disproportionately affected by domestic violence, but the issue is hushed in the black community. The reason, Stewart said, is that African Americans have been taught, “You don’t air your dirty laundry.”

Photo: Jennie Carter and children, Crystal and Nelson.

IF YOU NEED HELP

Abuse victims needing help should call Palm Beach County Victims Services at 561-355-2418. The agency also has referrals for Broward and Miami-Dade residents. For more information: On domestic abuse, or Destiny By Choice, log on to www.destinybychoice.org.

Saratoga Family Court judge removed from the bench-- repeatedly sent people to jail from his court while denying them fundamental rights, such as the right to representation and the right to a hearing.

http://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Saratoga-Family-Court-judge-removed-from-the-bench-799828.php

Saratoga Family Court judge removed from the bench

By LEIGH HORNBECK Staff Writer

ALBANY -- The state Commission on Judicial Conduct removed former Family Court JudgeGilbert Abramson from office, six weeks after the judge abruptly stepped down.

By issuing the ruling, the commission said despite Abramson's failure to win reelection and his resignation in September, it was not enough. The commission's ruling means Abramson may never serve as a judge again.

A two-year investigation found Abramson repeatedly sent people to jail from his court while denying them fundamental rights, such as the right to representation and the right to a hearing.

The investigation found that in four separate cases, litigants served from 21 to 268 days in jail after the judge flouted the law.

Robert Tembeckjian, legal counsel for the commission, said it is rare but not unheard of for a judge to be formally removed event after he or she has stepped down.

"The board members thought it was in the public benefit to let it be known what happened in the courtroom. He resigned near the very end of a long process," Tembeckjian said.

The commission also found Abramson on two separate occasions made "egregious and inexcusable" comments of a sexual nature to a woman in his courtroom because of a design on the T-shirt she was wearing.

To comment on this story go to Saratoga Seen