Sharia Law In Kansas Courts? You betcha!! Guaranteed Pay Day’$ for Profiteer’$ and OPRE$$ION of Women

Sharia Law In Kansas Courts: Ronald W Nelson ‏ @KansasDivorce An Overland Park Fathers Rights Attorney PRO Sharia Law In Kansas Courts - OPPRE$$ion of Women for Profit – *** KER - CHING$  Domestic Violence, Judicial Jujitsu, Power and Control, Corruption, Human Trafficking, Child trafficking,

  Ronald W Nelson ‏ @KansasDivorce #KSLegislature: Rep. Mast Makes Pitch for Anti-Sharia Law, Wading  Into Pending Divorce Trying To Make Her Point http://bit.ly/Jfz5rR

   From Kansas to Gaza—this is NOT His first ride on Sharia – From Overland Park to the  Middle East

10 American Families and Shariah Law American Laws for American Courts was crafted to protect American citizens’ constitutional rights against the infiltration and incursion of foreign laws and foreign legal doctrines, especially Islamic Shariah Law.

 

 

This post is a shout out to the following Court Whores (Money Making Profiteers) and Senate Paid Bribed Co-Conspirators who dare to even think that Sharia law should eve be considered an option in US courts and in Kansas Courts.

Naming Names

• Ron Nelson
• Guardian ad litem aka (Court Appointed Child Abuser) Leah Gagne
• Kansas Fatherhood Initiatives aka “DADDY WELFARE” (and the above sucking the gov teet)
• The Guardian Ad Litem Scandals
• Human Rights Violations
• KS Senators Jean Schodorf, Jeff King, David Haley, Tim Owen http://t.co/IKO0SoTC

 

Its monetary - it’s ALL about the Money. Always….

KSLEG KS last-ditch effort 4 Senate vote on a bill to keep foreign laws out of Kansas courts. (cont) http://tl.gd/hc8h5e Kansas bill titled “Concerning the protection of rights granted under the Constitution" which prohibits courts... fb.me/1filrq2qk Pro-Sharia Islamic forces are rallying against Kansas legislation which would prohibit courts from allowing Sharia law. http://t.co/wX6BP9Wt Ten American Families and Shariah in American State Courts THEY ALL DENY MOTHER CUSTODY OF HER CHILDREN http://t.co/G35g7pAi OF COURSE ALL MOTHERS LOST THEIR CHILDREN---- sound familiar... too familiar? http://t.co/G35g7pAi KS Senators Who WANT Sharia in Our Courts WTF?? Jean Schodorf, Jeff King, David Haley, Tim Owen http://t.co/IKO0SoTC #PullHeadOfFuckingAss

Mast makes last pitch for Kansas Sharia Law Bill

THE CAPITAL-JOURNAL

Photo Topeka Capital Journal

In a last-ditch effort to get a Senate vote on a bill to keep foreign laws out of Kansas courts, Rep. Peggy Mast, R-Emporia, staged a news conference this week to draw attention to a Wichita divorce in which she said the husband is requesting the court apply Islamic law, or sharia.

Mast planned to have a representative for the wife in the case at the event, but the representative decided against appearing at the last minute on the advice of the wife's attorney, because the case is still pending.

Mast plowed ahead with the event, telling a crowd of about 30 people who gathered Wednesday in the Statehouse's Old Supreme Courtroom that "there's been a lot of people feeling like we need to protect our Constitution and protect the freedoms we have."

The Wichita case involves Hussein Hamdeh, a Wichita State University physics professor. According to a brief filed by his wife's attorney, Hamdeh had two previous marriages in which he brought women from the Middle East to the United States and subsequently divorced them and was awarded "what appears to be substantially all of the property and custody of the minor children."

Hamdeh's attorney, John Lehecka, said he couldn't comment on the pending case except to say that Mast appeared to have only heard one side. "The court has heard both sides and the court’s going to make an appropriate decision based on the evidence and testimony the court has heard," he added.

The brief states Hamdeh met and married his current wife, Hala Hamdeh, in Lebanon in 2003 when he was 50 and she was 31. He brought her to the United States the same year and since then she has been a homemaker and mother to their daughter, Tala, and her step-son, Ahmad. Hala Hamdeh, the brief states, has no post-secondary education and is not fluent in English.

Hussein Hamdeh filed for divorce in November 2010. A point of contention in the case appears to be whether his promise of a $5,000 marriage gift, or Sadaq, is sufficient to settle his wife's side of the divorce financially, per his understanding of Lebanese religious laws and a "prenuptial" agreement, in English, that he had her sign in Wichita after their marriage. In the brief Hala Hamdeh's attorney argues that applying Islamic law to interpret whether there is a valid prenuptial agreement would violate her constitutional rights.

The brief states that in similar cases in New York and California, courts ruled that state divorce laws apply.

Ron Nelson, a family law attorney in Lenexa, said even under Islamic law the Sadaq, or dower, does not fulfill a husband's financial obligations to his wife in a divorce. He surmised that it may have entered the Hamdeh proceedings more as a negotiating tactic than a religious argument. (of course it did you likely suggested it—From Kansas to gaza)

"The husband's claims that dower should satisfy his marital obligation are simply his positioning — much the same as nearly every other person who is going through a divorce and makes a goodly sum of money tries to do," Nelson said. "But that's not a sharia question. (oh but it is which is why you so want sharia to increase your own finances- this way you can fuck EVERY mother in family court after all daddy is the Big financial pay off—protecting your own Job Security as the scum of the lawyers ) And it's certainly not a position limited to men with Islamic beliefs or a Middle East background. What it comes down to is that in any divorce pending in Kansas, the courts apply Kansas divorce and property division law and Kansas law on the support of spouses and children."

The judge has not made a ruling in the case, but Mast still said she's concerned about the use of "foreign law entered as evidence in the Kansas court system." (even when not stated as such women have fallen to the Courts Heavy hand of misogyny, cronyism and money making by oppressing women and TAKING her children from her.)

Nelson said whatever Mast's intentions, it's unwise for a legislator to wade into divorce proceedings that are two years in the making and still undecided. (That’s because this fuck is a mega money player in the Kansas fathers Rights to ABUSE OPPRESS MAIME TORTURE and KILL. The KS Legislature creates laws not to deny them – Have ever heard of the Constitution? or did you miss that in lawyer 101 school? apparently… anything to See your name huh? well google your name now)

"This case has over 43 pages of docket," he said. "It's obviously a complex and rancorous case." (hmmmm must be some shit serious abuse going on as is ALWAYS the case in ALL so called “High Conflict Case” *ker* ching-

In a media release, Mast suggested that Hala Hamdeh's rights to custody of her daughter are also under threat because of sharia, but the guardian ad litem (better know nas Court Appointed Child Abusers—also very much a part of the of Color of law to deny Civil Rights –several in collusion- *Ker ching$ appointed by the court to look after Tala's best interests, Leah Gagne, said religion has not been a factor. (religion? come the fuck on religion? ha Just another easy word for your bias and cover so you can keep making the mula)

“All cases that involve extensive and heavy litigation take their toll on kids," Gagne said. (get rid of Therapeutic Jurisprudence bitches like you that MAKE IT HEAVY LITIGATION – oh wait then you'd have to work for a living- loose that easy blood money)

"This is no different than two Protestants fighting over a child, two Catholics fighting over a child, two atheists fighting over a child.” (You Dumb fucking Bitch its not religion but hey what ever it takes to make your $$$)

Mast told the crowd that gathered for her media event that she's most concerned about the rights of women and children in Kansas being abridged or violated by Islamic law. She said she's been working on the foreign law bill for two years, bringing in speakers like an ex-terrorist and a former Delta Force special operations soldier.

"If the bill does not pass this year, it's going to be hard to gin up enough energy for the next two years," she said, referring to the next election cycle.

"Father's Right's" Movement: How to Legally Stalk, Harass, and Intimidate Victims of Domestic Violence after a Restraining Order has been Issued

http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/FRtactic.html

STALKING THROUGH THE COURTS
by Janet Normalvanbreucher

Table of Contents:

• Introduction
• Historical Background of the Father's Rights Movement
• The Quest for Dominance and Control
• Mom, Country, and Apple Pie -- Why People Help Them
• Differentiating Legitimate Fatherhood Groups from Illegitimate "Father's Rights" Groups
  -- Ten Tips for Single Dads
• IS There Bias in the Courts?
• The "Father's Manifesto" - A Political Platform to Repeal the 19th Amendment
  -- Father's Manifesto Signatories
• Practicing Law Without A License -- A Pro-Se Army
• Use of the Internet to Disseminate Information
• The Seduction of the Media
• Father's Right's Advocates in High Places
• How the Father's Right's Movement Hurts Men with Legitimate Disputes
• Mein Kampf -- Indoctrination Tactics of The Father's Rights Movement
• Brief History of VAWA and the Restraining Order
• Are Restraining Orders Widely Abused by Women as a Tactical Maneuver in a Divorce?
• Attacking Her Credibility
• DOJ -- Profile of an Obsessive Stalker
• "She Deserved It" -- How the Criminal Process Fails Victims
• Malicious Prosecution and Abuse of Process in the Courts
  -- Victoria D.'s story
• Vindictive Custody/Visitation Suits
• Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
• Parental Alienation Syndrome
  -- if Psychologists Discredit this Theory, Why Is it So Widely Accepted by the Courts?
• Harassment of Judges, the Legislature, and Potential Jurors
• Lawyers Who Knowingly Help Men Harass their Victims
• Possible Solutions:
  -- Screening of Pro-Se Lawsuits, Criminal Charges, Motions for Reconsideration
  -- Criminal Sanctions for Filing Frivolous Charges with State Administrative Agencies
  -- Tighter Enforcement of Stalking Laws
  -- Rule 11-type Pro-Se Sanctions for Abuse of Process
  -- Prosecuting Groups who are Practicing Law Without A License
  -- Law School Programs - Helping the Victims Fight Back
  -- Lawsuits against FR Groups under the VAWA as Unincorporated Associations.
  -- Legislative Action

A Proposed Constitutional Amendment

Kansas Court of Appeals To Hear a Child Custody Case Involving The Role of Case Managers (and other 3rd party interferers) in Child Custody Matters.

“Therapeutic Jurisprudence - The sociological and psychological research on families and child well-being impacts public policy and the issues of child custody in family law. The research frequently is misrepresented, and mis-cited by mental health professionals, lawyers, forensic psychologists and others, as well as interest groups lobbying for laws. http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/child-custody-evaluations.html

Case Managers, Guardians ad Litem; Parenting Coordinators; Custody Evaluators, etc. the various forms of so-called ADR (alternate dispute resolution) practitioners, such as GALs, parenting coordinators, parenting evaluators, forensic psychologists, recommending mediators, special masters, court-ordered therapists, other court-appointed mental health professionals, supervised visitation centers, and other profiteers of "therapeutic jurisprudence", whose methods involve -- intrusion and coercion under the threat of court sanctions, and actual or de facto extra-judicial decision-making, which have multiple things wrong with them, not the least of which is denigration of due process, and the diminution of a publicly observable, regulated, and appealable "rule by law" by substituting the caprice of men and women.

These practices have been promoted as "cures" for ailings of the court system and the litigants in it by self-serving persons who apparently are ignorant, or else just do not care about the harms they cause to children and their parents because they make money from the ideas they promote, churning profit in proceedings that fly in the face of the foundations of our justice system. http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/child-custody-evaluations.html

Also; the majority of 'high conflict' divorce case's are Domestic Violence and or Abusive. Good parents 90% of them never have to go through the above, it is the 10 % the abusive ones or aka "High Conflict" that the above make their living on. Return the Judge back to the Court room, get rid of the non factual 'opinion and belief' of third party $ hand outs who block access to Justice/ e.g. the Judge.”

 

Kansas Court to Consider Case Manager Custody Case Appeal

TOPEKA — The Kansas Court of Appeals is set to hear a child custody case next month that addresses the role of case managers in custody matters in the state.

The case, which is scheduled for a May 15 hearing before the appeals court, involves Karen Williams, who lost full custody of her child in March 2011 after a case manager recommended to the judge that custody go to the child's father. Williams said the decision to separate her from her daughter was made based on confidential conversations between the judge and the case manager.

Williams and her attorney argue that she has a constitutional right to a hearing in which the case manager must present the evidence to back up her custody recommendation and allow Williams to respond to it, The Topeka Capital-Journal reported Monday.

"I've not been allowed due process, and I want a day in court," Williams said.

In Kansas, case managers, who work with parents in "high-conflict" relationships on their visitation schedules and custody, are appointed by judges and aren't required to have a professional license.

"The only qualification currently is that a judge appoints them," said Ron Nelson, a Lenexa lawyer who specializes in family law.

Nelson said the use of case managers has been authorized for about 10 years, and concerns about them overstepping their bounds have mounted due to a lack of clear guidelines about their responsibilities and authority. He said the case management concerns are about non-judicial officers making custody decisions that should be the purview of the courts. .

The Legislature is also considering a bill requiring specific qualifications for case managers. It would restrict judges to appointing only licensed psychologists, psychotherapists, counselors, therapists, social workers or lawyers.

Rep. Joe Patton, R-Topeka, a lawyer who serves on the judiciary conference committee, said he has "mixed feelings" about the bill.

"It's certainly very important to have someone qualified," he said. "It's very possible someone can be qualified without a particular license, but as a general rule we want someone qualified."

Cheryl Powers, the case manager on Williams' case, declined to comment on the Williams brief with the hearing pending. But she said she believes the backlash against case managers is coming from a group of disgruntled lawyers.

"There are certain attorneys that are less than happy with the fact that some of us have quasi-judicial powers without a license," she said. "They're attorneys and don't have that much power. They are not happy with that."

Child Custody Evaluations --THE CASE FOR ABOLISHING CUSTODY EVALUATORS

Parenting Evaluation, Parenting Plans...
Reevaluating the Evaluators: Rethinking the Assumptions of Therapeutic Jurisprudence in the Family Courts

THE CASE FOR ABOLISHING CUSTODY EVALUATORS  By Margaret Dore.

Reevaluating the Evaluators: Rethinking the Assumptions of Therapeutic Jurisprudence in the Family Courts

There is an evolving and worsening mess in the systems and procedures currently in place to determine child custody and perform child custody evaluations when parents disagree.

This article discusses the minimum disclosures every child custody evaluator (also known as "parenting evaluator" or "best interests" guardian ad litem or GAL) [1], or parenting coordinator (herein called a "mental health professional" or "MHP") [2a] should be required to make, responding satisfactorily and in full, before being appointed in any family law case to do a child custody evaluation -- in fact before doing anything beyond answering a list of limited, detailed, specific, and narrowly-crafted questions the answers to which are directly within the MHP's field of proved expertise. This format is being used to help illustrate a problem, and with another purpose in mind. That purpose is to call for a revolt altogether against the notion of "therapeutic jurisprudence" -- which has been proved to do little to benefit children, much to benefit the divorce industry, much to complicate and pervert our family laws, much to erode fundamental rights and liberties, and much to harm the families who become trapped in the system. There are many problems, of course. But they are symptoms. Step one is to get the agent of most of them out of our family courts. The Emperor has no clothes.

There have been many calls for reform [2b], but for the most part, while they are admirable and well-documented intentions, they miss the boat; while they identify various problems and propose fixes in the system, they fail to identify and address the core reason the system is sick. Thus the proposals seek to treat only symptoms while failing to apply a cure to eliminate the disease.

Contrary to the public perception, and the perception that those seeking lucrative appointments in the court system wish to convey, a degree in some field of mental health does not qualify the individual to perform work that consists of open-ended investigating, evaluating, recommending, or decision-making about other persons' families and children. [3] What originally commenced, and was thought to be a good idea as a judge's assigment of fairly narrow tasks designed to streamline fact-finding and protect individuals' therapy records [4] (e.g. asking a social worker to do a home study, e.g. asking a psychologist to opine on the possible effects on functioning of a party's known or suspected personality disorder or state of depression when mental health already is at issue) has burgeoned into a free-for-all in which a panoply of MHPs make work and involve themselves in the family court system at enormous cost and detriment to the parties with expensive litigation-exacerbating processes, trials-within-trials, experts and counter-experts, and inevitable referrals to additional MHPs (often cronies) for all manner of alternate dispute resolutions and sometimes endless (and often utterly unproven) therapies. [5]

(1) Do you have a law degree or previous extensive experience as a law enforcement officer doing investigations, and if not, what qualifies you to do this work?

The milieu in which the MHP will be working is the justice system, in which litigants have certain rights of due process [6] and in which decisions made in connection with one issue can materially affect a litigant's position as to seemingly unrelated issues in the same case, and in which milieu, inter alia, centuries of jurisprudence have honed certain concepts involving what constitutes reliable evidence, burdens of proof, and other legal aspects bearing on the ultimate resolution of a case. [7] Sociologists, psychologists, and even real scientists by reason of their formal training tend to have little understanding of or appreciation for these legal concepts. [8]

Read more here: http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/child-custody-evaluations.html

Guardians ad Litem; Parenting Coordinators; Custody Evaluators, etc.

Guardians ad Litem; Parenting Coordinators; Custody Evaluators, etc.

Social Workers, Visiting programs, batterer so called treatment bullshit TREC --- Safe Visit, Connie Sanchez and all those others who have created job security by protecting bad dad, hating women, and getting kick backs perks and pay offs for spilling the blood of mothers and their children. Horizons Bud Dale, Sherri Keller Shawnee County Courthouse…… and many more.

This category includes the various forms of so-called ADR (alternate dispute resolution) practitioners, such as GALs, parenting coordinators, parenting evaluators, forensic psychologists, recommending mediators, special masters, court-ordered therapists, other court-appointed mental health professionals, supervised visitation centers, and other profiteers of "therapeutic jurisprudence", whose methods involve -- in non-criminal cases -- intrusion and coercion under the threat of court sanctions, and actual or de facto extra-judicial decision-making. This website heavily criticizes all of these practices, which have multiple things wrong with them, not the least of which is denigration of due process, and the diminution of a publicly observable, regulated, and appealable "rule by law" by substituting the caprice of men and women. These practices have been promoted as "cures" for ailings of the court system and the litigants in it by self-serving persons who apparently are ignorant, or else just do not care about the harms they cause to children and their parents because they make money from the ideas they promote, churning profit in proceedings that fly in the face of the foundations of our justice system.

The bulk of these materials are listed in the section on PSYCHOLOGY. Also see the sections on the specific substantive issues, such as child development or parental alienation.

Court-appt'd Parenting Evaluators and GALs: The Case for Abolition by Margaret Dore PDF SCHOLAR

Guardians ad Litem in Custody Litigation: The Case for Abolition by Richard Ducote PDF SCHOLAR

Guardians for Profit: LA Times expose, elder abuse by professional conservators by LA Times Staff

Parenting Coordination Issues (outline) by liz

Parenting Coordinators, Practical Considerations by liz

Proper Role of Mental Health Professionals in Domestic Violence Cases by Barry Goldstein, Esq. Editorial

Psychological Testing in Family Court - Discovery Issues by liz

Psychological Testing in Family Court - How to Respond to the forensic MMPI-2 by liz

Signs of a Bad Custody Evaluation by Joel V. Klass, M.D. SCHOLAR

Stuart A. Greenberg, Ph.D., Fraud and Sexual Perversion in a "Top" Custody Evaluator

Troubling Admission of Supervised Visitation Records in Court by Stern/Oehme PDF SCHOLAR

What's Wrong with Parenting Coordination by liz

Fathers Rights - Mysogynists, Woman Haters, Who Attack All Women

Southern Poverty Law Center on the Fathers' Rights Movement

Monday, 19 March 2012 15:16

"...an underworld of misogynists, woman-haters whose fury goes well beyond criticism of the family court system, domestic violence laws, and false rape accusations. There are literally hundreds of websites, blogs and forums devoted to attacking virtually all women (or, at least, Westernized ones)

-- the so-called "manosphere,"... While some of them voice legitimate and sometimes disturbing complaints about the treatment of men, what is most remarkable is the misogynistic tone that pervades so many. Women are routinely maligned as sluts, gold-diggers, temptresses and worse; overly sympathetic men are dubbed "manginas"; and police and other officials are called their armed enablers...

"But some experts argue that men's rights groups have been remarkably successful... have taken over the way courts deal with custody issues, particularly when there are allegations of abuse, largely by convincing them that there is such a thing as 'Parental Alienation Syndrome' (PAS)... have 'been able to get custody evaluators, mediators, guardians ad litem and child protective service workers to believe that women and children lie about abuse.'...

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/a-war-on-women

Source: Justice Posterous

American Mothers Political Party Denounces “Dominick’s Law” In Michigan

American Mothers Political Party Denounces “Dominick’s Law” In Michigan

Written by Staff

Tuesday, 20 March 2012 14:07

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
American Mothers Political Party
March 20, 2012

American Mothers Political Party

Denounces “Dominick’s Law” In Michigan

Mothers are the natural guardians of children as Corrine Baker was when she used her own body as a shield to try and protect her child, Dominick Calhoun.

Neighbors ignored her screams and authorities said Baker did not do “enough” to protect her son from a fatal beating inflicted by her then-live-in boyfriend, Brandon Joshua-Frederick Hayes, who was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for torture, murder and child abuse.  This is what second degree (scapegoating) manslaughter looks like is when a woman endures this kind of beating trying to protect her child.

It has been duly noted that those supporting and those who are the purported “creators” of Dominick’s Law and the recent threats that have been made against those that support Dominick’s mother.  We are not deterred.

According Michigan Legislature: 
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/20112012/billintroduced/House/htm/2011-HIB-5078.htm

(g) "Serious mental harm" means an injury to a child's mental

condition or welfare that is not necessarily permanent but results

in visibly demonstrable manifestations of a substantial disorder of

thought or mood which significantly impairs judgment, behavior,

capacity to recognize reality, or ability to cope with the ordinary

demands of life.

“Dominick's Law” will only justify what Michigan has done to this battered mother who tried to protect her child and all future domestic abuse victims.  In essence, the pseudo-scientific theory of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) will be legal in Michigan if this law is passed the way it is currently written.  What is “enough” to protect a child from harm?

American Mothers Political Party is not just mothers but fathers, sisters aunts, daughters, sons, nieces, nephews, family, friends, coworkers and neighbors who support battered mothers and their rights to raise their children.

Until human mothers are honored or recognized as the natural guardians of her children, no rights will exist for any one. “Mother” is the cry of the dying soldier on the battlefield, “Mother” is the first person everyone sees when they are born, all other species “get this” - all except the terribly wrong and failed “human experiment”' of the murder of motherhood, and everyone's else’s rights over mother nature’s.

AMPP will not support this law as it is currently written and will continue to denounce those that mean to do the supporters of mothers harm.

# #

Videos http://vodpod.com/ampp/corrinebaker

AMPP stands in support of Corrine Baker. Authorities said Baker did not do enough to protect her son from a fatal beating inflicted by her then-live-in boyfriend, Brandon Joshua-Frederick Hayes, who was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for torture, murder and child abuse. ALTHOUGH SHE USED HER BODY AS SHIELD.

Take a Look at what 2nd degree (scapegoating) manslaughter is when you endure this kind of beating trying to PROTECT her CHILD.The DA is scapegoating the Calhoun's are scapegoating and Dominick's law will only JUSTIFY what MI has done to this battered mom who tried to protect!! 15-30 years!! Scapegoating!!!